12 published "best AEO or GEO agency" lists name 82 different agencies. Only 26 appear on two or more of those lists, and only 4 (Omniscient Digital, iPullRank, First Page Sage, NoGood) appear on more than half. The lists agree far less than their confident titles suggest.
GEO and AEO Agency Comparison for B2B SaaS (2026)
Last verified 29 September 2026
We scored 32 GEO and AEO agencies that serve B2B SaaS companies on one public rubric. RevenueZen scored highest with 89.5 out of 100. The score measures public evidence and buying transparency. It does not measure delivery quality, and a low score often means an agency publishes less, not that it performs worse.
peppereffect publishes this page and sells the same kind of service, so we are not in the ranking. Who we are, what we can prove and where we fit is set out further down this page.
Comparison table
Evidence bands: A = tracked AI visibility share, named client. B = AI result, named client, agency-reported. C = classic search metrics, or AI results on own properties. D = unnamed client. E = no AI-search evidence published. Agencies with equal scores share a rank. Click a name for the full profile.
Filter and sort
| # | Agency | Best for | Evidence | Published price | Clutch | Score | Full profile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RevenueZenPortland, OR | Best forB2B SaaS and services companies that want SEO and GEO with interview-led content and LinkedIn distribution on a monthly package. | BAI result | PriceSix tiers, $3,000/mo (Foundation) to $15,000/mo (Total Market); month-to-month | Clutch: 4.9 · 38 reviews | 89.5/100 | |
| 2 | LoudFaceDubai, UAE (San Francisco operations) | Best forGrowth-stage B2B SaaS and tech companies that want SEO, AEO/GEO, CRO and Webflow design and development in one retainer. | ATracked AI visibility share | PriceEngagements start from $5k/mo | Clutch: 4.8 · 2 reviews | 84.0/100 | |
| 3 | StratabeatBurlington, MA | Best forB2B SaaS and tech companies that want GEO combined with SEO, CRO, content and web design in one retainer. | BAI result | PriceFrom $8k/mo (Start-Up tier); Scale $15k to $21k/mo; Dominate from $22k/mo | Clutch: 5.0 · 13 reviews | 79.5/100 | |
| 4 | Discovered LabsLondon, England | Best forB2B SaaS companies that want a month-to-month AEO/GEO and SEO program with AI citation tracking. | BAI result | PriceEstablish EUR 6,995/mo; Compete EUR 10,995/mo; Outlier from EUR 15,995/mo; month-to-month | Clutch: 4.9 · 4 reviews | 79.0/100 | |
| 5 | WebFXHarrisburg, PA | Best forCompanies of many sizes and industries that want one large full-service agency with an in-house AI visibility tracking platform. | BAI result | PriceGEO from $3,000/mo (entry plan) up to $68,250/mo (Enterprise+) | Clutch: 4.9 · 450 reviews | 78.5/100 | |
| 6 | Rock The RankingsCharlotte, NC | Best forB2B SaaS and tech companies that want senior-led SEO and AI search programs with results reported against a pipeline forecast. | ATracked AI visibility share | PriceStrategy from $4,500/mo; Done-for-You from $7,650/mo; Authority from $14,000/mo (90-day term) | Clutch: 5.0 · 14 reviews | 78.0/100 | |
| 7 | TripleDartPlano, TX and Bengaluru, India | Best forB2B SaaS and tech companies that want SEO, AEO and GEO connected to paid media and RevOps execution. | BAI result | PriceRetainers from $5,000/mo; AEO page lists $6,500/mo for Paid Performance | Clutch: Not verified | 77.5/100 | |
| 8 | Omniscient DigitalAustin, TX | Best forB2B software companies that want strategy-led SEO and GEO tied to pipeline on full-service engagements. | ATracked AI visibility share | PriceFull-service from $10,000/mo; SEO Strategy Development from $15,000 | Clutch: 4.8 · 6 reviews | 71.5/100 | |
| 8 | Single GrainLos Angeles, CA | Best forBrands that want AEO/GEO combined with SEO and paid media management from one agency. | BAI result | PriceNot published | Clutch: 4.8 · 12 reviews | 71.5/100 | |
| 10 | Siege MediaSan Diego, CA | Best forEnterprise and midmarket brands that want content, digital PR and GEO delivered as research-backed assets. | ATracked AI visibility share | PriceNot published | Clutch: 4.9 · 48 reviews | 67.0/100 | |
| 11 | MinuttiaNot published | Best forB2B SaaS companies that want content-led SEO and AEO with digital PR and Reddit work run as one strategy. | BAI result | PriceMinimum project size $4,000+ | Clutch: 4.9 · 16 reviews | 64.5/100 | |
| 11 | SkaleLondon, England | Best forGrowth-stage SaaS and tech brands that want organic growth across Google, Reddit, YouTube and AI search, reported against signups and revenue. | BAI result | PriceNot published | Clutch: 4.9 · 16 reviews | 64.5/100 | |
| 11 | OptimistDes Moines, IA | Best forB2B technology companies that want an SEO plus AEO/GEO consulting or full-service program with published starting prices. | CClassic search metrics | PriceRoadmap from $7,500; retainers from $3,000/mo (advisory) or $4,000/mo (full-service) | Clutch: 5.0 · 1 review | 64.5/100 | |
| 14 | Arc IntermediaKing of Prussia, PA | Best forEnterprise and mid-market organizations that want GEO/AEO work bundled with SEO, paid media and web services from one agency. | BAI result | PriceApproximately $1,500 to $10,000+ per month; custom proposal required | Clutch: 5.0 · 4 reviews | 63.0/100 | |
| 15 | ScalerrsFully remote | Best forFunded B2B SaaS teams that want SEO plus AEO, Reddit, YouTube and third-party listicle work in one SaaS-only engagement. | BAI result | PriceCustom scoped, typically from about $5K/month; month-to-month | Clutch: 5.0 · 6 reviews | 60.0/100 | |
| 15 | GraphiteNot published | Best forBrands that want research-driven AEO and SEO growth work. | ATracked AI visibility share | PriceNot published | Clutch: Not verified | 60.0/100 | |
| 17 | DirectiveOrange County, CA | Best forB2B and SaaS companies that want GEO run inside a broader performance marketing program tied to pipeline. | BAI result | PriceNot published | Clutch: 4.8 · 56 reviews | 59.5/100 | |
| 18 | Breaking B2BNot published | Best forB2B and SaaS companies that want senior-led SEO and AEO tied to demos and pipeline on a six or twelve month program. | BAI result | PricePlans from $4k/mo; tiers up to $40,000+/mo; six or twelve month minimum | Clutch: Not verified | 56.5/100 | |
| 18 | Avenue ZMiami, FL | Best forConsumer, fintech and emerging-tech brands that want AI search optimization run together with digital PR and performance media. | BAI result | PriceNot published | Clutch: 4.7 · 15 reviews | 56.5/100 | |
| 20 | FoundationPhiladelphia, PA | Best forB2B tech and SaaS companies that want AI visibility built through content plus off-site distribution such as Reddit, YouTube and earned media. | BAI result | PriceNot published | Clutch: 5.0 · 14 reviews | 54.5/100 | |
| 21 | NoGoodNew York, NY | Best forVenture-backed brands that want AEO run alongside paid, SEO and CRO inside one growth retainer. | BAI result | PriceAverage retainer above $20,000/mo | Clutch: 5.0 · 2 reviews | 47.5/100 | |
| 22 | OmniusLondon, UK | Best forB2B SaaS and fintech companies that want SEO and AEO/GEO from a small agency with proprietary AI SEO analytics software. | BAI result | PriceNot published | Clutch: Not verified | 46.5/100 | |
| 23 | Ten SpeedChicago, IL | Best forB2B and SaaS brands that want an organic growth, content and SEO program with AEO added, led by the founders. | CClassic search metrics | PriceNot published | Clutch: 5.0 · 5 reviews | 44.0/100 | |
| 24 | Go Fish DigitalRaleigh, NC | Best forMid-market and enterprise brands in ecommerce, finance and retail that want GEO and SEO inside a full-service digital marketing engagement. | CClassic search metrics | PriceNot published | Clutch: 5.0 · 13 reviews | 40.5/100 | |
| 25 | AnimalzNew York, NY | Best forB2B SaaS and tech companies that want thought-leadership content and SEO/AEO programs on a monthly retainer. | CClassic search metrics | PriceNot published | Clutch: No reviews on Clutch | 36.5/100 | |
| 26 | First Page SageNot published | Best forB2B SaaS and enterprise companies that want thought-leadership SEO and GEO content on a long-term retainer. | CClassic search metrics | PriceNot published | Clutch: No reviews on Clutch | 34.5/100 | |
| 27 | OuterBoxAkron, OH | Best forEcommerce, manufacturing and industrial brands that want GEO folded into a full-service SEO, paid media and web program. | ENo AI-search evidence published | PriceNot published | Clutch: 5.0 · 93 reviews | 34.0/100 | |
| 28 | ContentlyNot published | Best forRegulated enterprise marketing teams that want a content platform with editorial workflow, a creator network and an AEO/LLM optimization module. | DUnnamed client | PriceNot published | Clutch: Not verified | 33.0/100 | |
| 29 | Marcel DigitalChicago, IL | Best forB2B companies, including higher education, manufacturing and logistics, that want AEO, SEO, paid media and web development from one generalist agency. | DUnnamed client | PriceNot published | Clutch: 4.8 · 20 reviews | 30.0/100 | |
| 30 | iPullRankNot published | Best forLarge enterprise brands that want a research-driven, technical GEO and content engineering practice. | DUnnamed client | PriceNot published | Clutch: No reviews on Clutch | 24.0/100 | |
| 31 | GenevateNot published | Best forCompanies across professional services, consumer, tech and healthcare that want a PR-led approach to how AI search platforms describe them. | ENo AI-search evidence published | PriceNot published | Clutch: Not verified | 13.0/100 | |
| 32 | Digital CheddarOkemos, MI | Best forConsumer and CPG brands that want a small hands-on agency for paid media, social and creative with AEO as an added service. | DUnnamed client | PriceNot published | Clutch: Not verified | 9.0/100 |
No agencies match these filters. Reset filters to show the full ranking.
How we scored
Six criteria. The weights were fixed in our build specification on 28 September 2026, before the scoring pass on 29 September. Each criterion is scored 0 to 5, then weighted into a total out of 100. We counted only evidence on the agency's own site or its Clutch profile, opened on 29 September 2026. Numbers that appear only in someone else's roundup did not count.
How it is scored
Weight 25%
Named AI-search result
5 = tracked AI visibility share for a named client over a stated period (A). 3.5 = named client, AI metric, agency-reported (B). 1.5 = named client with classic search metrics only, or AI results on the agency's own properties (C). 1 = unnamed client (D). 0 = none (E).
Weight 20%
B2B SaaS depth
Named B2B SaaS clients and case studies on the agency's own site. 5 = three or more named SaaS case studies. 4 = two, or one plus named SaaS clients. 3 = one. 2 = SaaS logos without case studies. 1 = no named SaaS work.
Weight 15%
Pre-contract AI baseline
5 if the agency itself offers to measure or review your AI visibility before a contract (audit, snapshot or call). 0 otherwise.
Weight 15%
Independent reviews
Clutch, read live. 5 = 40+ reviews, 4 = 10 to 39, 2.5 = 3 to 9, 1 = 1 or 2, 0 = none or no confirmed profile. One point off below 4.5 stars.
Weight 15%
Published methodology
5 = named framework plus a public write-up of the process. 3 = one of the two. 0 = neither.
Weight 10%
Price on own site
5 if the agency publishes a price, range or minimum for the service a direct buyer purchases. 0 otherwise.
Weights sum to 100%
What the rubric favors, and what it does not measure. Four criteria (baseline, reviews, method, price) reward transparency and together carry 55 points. That favors agencies that publish, and disadvantages boutiques, agencies that bill their diagnostics, and enterprise shops whose client work is confidential. A named framework earns points whether or not it works better. The rubric also does not measure the quality of the writing, how fast an agency responds, or whether its results would repeat for you. Nobody can measure those from the outside. Use the rubric to build a shortlist, then use the free baselines and reference calls to decide.
All 32 agency profiles
Ranked by score. Every link goes to the specific page where we found the fact. "Not published" means we looked and did not find it; it is not a judgment.
Atracked AI visibility share, named clientBAI result, named client, agency-reportedCclassic search metrics, or AI results on own propertiesDunnamed clientEno AI-search evidence published
RevenueZen
Portland, OR
Best for: B2B SaaS and services companies that want SEO and GEO with interview-led content and LinkedIn distribution on a monthly package.
BAI result, named client, agency-reported
Published priceSix tiers, $3,000/mo (Foundation) to $15,000/mo (Total Market); month-to-month
Evidence 3.5/5
Baseline 5/5
B2B SaaS depth 5/5
Reviews 4/5
Pricing 5/5
Method 5/5
Full profile
- Website
- revenuezen.com
- HQ / founded / team
- Portland, OR · 2017 · 10
- Services
- B2B SEO, GEO, Interview-led AI content, LinkedIn content marketing, Content strategy, SEO audits
- Best named AI result
- Expensify: In a 6-month engagement: AI Overviews presence 4x'd; Gen AI referral traffic doubled, converting at up to 5% versus 1-2% from regular search. (source)
- Evidence band
- B: AI result, named client, agency-reported
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- Yes, free GEO audit using a self-serve checklist and tool
- Own ranking
- Publishes its own list and places itself first: see list
- Evidence and scope notes
- The free GEO audit is a self-serve checklist and tool, and the Expensify AI figures are agency-reported.
Evidence 3.5/5 · Baseline 5/5 · B2B SaaS depth 5/5 · Reviews 4/5 · Pricing 5/5 · Method 5/5
Back to ranking ↑LoudFace
Dubai, UAE (San Francisco operations)
Best for: Growth-stage B2B SaaS and tech companies that want SEO, AEO/GEO, CRO and Webflow design and development in one retainer.
ATracked AI visibility share, named client
Published priceEngagements start from $5k/mo
Evidence 5/5
Baseline 5/5
B2B SaaS depth 4/5
Reviews 1/5
Pricing 5/5
Method 5/5
Full profile
- Website
- loudface.co
- HQ / founded / team
- Dubai, UAE (San Francisco operations) · 2019 · 2 to 9
- Services
- GEO, SEO and AEO, Google AI Overviews, CRO, Webflow development, UX/UI design
- Published price
- Engagements start from $5k/mo
- Best named AI result
- Toku: 97.8% AI visibility on "best stablecoin payroll providers"; average cited position 2.1 across all 95 tracked prompts, 30 days to 19 August 2026. (source)
- Evidence band
- A: Tracked AI visibility share, named client
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- Yes, audit of brand standing across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity
- Own ranking
- Publishes its own list and places itself first: see list
- Evidence and scope notes
- Its Clutch profile has 2 reviews; the headline figures cover a 30-day window across 95 tracked prompts.
Evidence 5.0/5 · Baseline 5/5 · B2B SaaS depth 4/5 · Reviews 1/5 · Pricing 5/5 · Method 5/5
Back to ranking ↑Stratabeat
Burlington, MA
Best for: B2B SaaS and tech companies that want GEO combined with SEO, CRO, content and web design in one retainer.
BAI result, named client, agency-reported
Published priceFrom $8k/mo (Start-Up tier); Scale $15k to $21k/mo; Dominate from $22k/mo
Evidence 3.5/5
Baseline 5/5
B2B SaaS depth 4/5
Reviews 4/5
Pricing 5/5
Method 3/5
Full profile
- Website
- stratabeat.com
- HQ / founded / team
- Burlington, MA · 2011 · 10 to 49
- Services
- SEO, GEO, Content marketing, CRO, Digital PR, Web design
- Best named AI result
- WellSaid: Within 90 days: 209% increase in ChatGPT brand mentions, 1,076% increase in non-branded organic traffic, #1 most cited brand in AI Search in their category. (source)
- Evidence band
- B: AI result, named client, agency-reported
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- Yes, GEO audit available on request
- Method
- No named framework
- Own ranking
- Publishes its own list and places itself first: see list
- Evidence and scope notes
- Its headline AI result appears on its own ranking page rather than a dedicated case study.
Evidence 3.5/5 · Baseline 5/5 · B2B SaaS depth 4/5 · Reviews 4/5 · Pricing 5/5 · Method 3/5
Back to ranking ↑Discovered Labs
London, England
Best for: B2B SaaS companies that want a month-to-month AEO/GEO and SEO program with AI citation tracking.
BAI result, named client, agency-reported
Published priceEstablish EUR 6,995/mo; Compete EUR 10,995/mo; Outlier from EUR 15,995/mo; month-to-month
Evidence 3.5/5
Baseline 5/5
B2B SaaS depth 5/5
Reviews 2.5/5
Pricing 5/5
Method 3/5
Full profile
- Website
- discoveredlabs.com
- HQ / founded / team
- London, England · 2024 · About 15+ (own roster); Clutch lists 2 to 9
- Services
- AEO, GEO, SEO, Reddit marketing, Search Visibility Diagnostic
- Published price
- Establish EUR 6,995/mo; Compete EUR 10,995/mo; Outlier from EUR 15,995/mo; month-to-month
- Best named AI result
- Granola: +4,600% Activated users from AI; +558% AI citation rate (non-branded); +739% AI mention rate, January 2026 to August 2026. (source)
- Evidence band
- B: AI result, named client, agency-reported
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- Yes, free 30-minute call showing where you appear in Google and AI
- Method
- CITABLE
- Evidence and scope notes
- Retainers start at EUR 6,995 per month, and results are shown as agency-reported rates without underlying prompt-level answers.
Evidence 3.5/5 · Baseline 5/5 · B2B SaaS depth 5/5 · Reviews 2.5/5 · Pricing 5/5 · Method 3/5
Back to ranking ↑WebFX
Harrisburg, PA
Best for: Companies of many sizes and industries that want one large full-service agency with an in-house AI visibility tracking platform.
BAI result, named client, agency-reported
Published priceGEO from $3,000/mo (entry plan) up to $68,250/mo (Enterprise+)
Evidence 3.5/5
Baseline 5/5
B2B SaaS depth 3/5
Reviews 5/5
Pricing 5/5
Method 3/5
Full profile
- Website
- webfx.com
- HQ / founded / team
- Harrisburg, PA · 1995 · 750+
- Services
- SEO, GEO/AI search optimization, PPC, Content marketing, Web design, CRO
- Best named AI result
- Thompson Tractor: 586% increase in traffic from generative AI sources; 500% increase in leads from AI platforms. AI search work launched January 2025. (source)
- Evidence band
- B: AI result, named client, agency-reported
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- Yes, free preliminary audit of brand sentiment in AI conversations
- Method
- No named framework
- Own ranking
- Publishes its own list and places itself first: see list
- Evidence and scope notes
- A generalist agency, and its strongest AI-search case study is a heavy-equipment dealer rather than a B2B SaaS company.
Evidence 3.5/5 · Baseline 5/5 · B2B SaaS depth 3/5 · Reviews 5/5 · Pricing 5/5 · Method 3/5
Back to ranking ↑Rock The Rankings
Charlotte, NC
Best for: B2B SaaS and tech companies that want senior-led SEO and AI search programs with results reported against a pipeline forecast.
ATracked AI visibility share, named client
Published priceStrategy from $4,500/mo; Done-for-You from $7,650/mo; Authority from $14,000/mo (90-day term)
Evidence 5/5
Baseline 0/5
B2B SaaS depth 4/5
Reviews 4/5
Pricing 5/5
Method 5/5
Full profile
- Website
- rocktherankings.com
- HQ / founded / team
- Charlotte, NC · 2018 or 2019 (sources differ) · 10 to 49
- Services
- AI Search Optimization (GEO), SEO, Content strategy and production, Link and citation building, Technical SEO, SEO consulting
- Published price
- Strategy from $4,500/mo; Done-for-You from $7,650/mo; Authority from $14,000/mo (90-day term)
- Best named AI result
- Rasa: Non-branded AI presence rose from 28.4% Q1 average to 32.6% in Q2; sessions arriving from AI assistants 8.3× (+732% quarter-over-quarter). (source)
- Evidence band
- A: Tracked AI visibility share, named client
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- No evidence found
- Own ranking
- Publishes its own list and places itself first: see list
- Evidence and scope notes
- Published prices differ between the homepage and the pricing page, and most engagements are quoted at $10K per month or more.
Evidence 5.0/5 · Baseline 0/5 · B2B SaaS depth 4/5 · Reviews 4/5 · Pricing 5/5 · Method 5/5
Back to ranking ↑TripleDart
Plano, TX and Bengaluru, India
Best for: B2B SaaS and tech companies that want SEO, AEO and GEO connected to paid media and RevOps execution.
BAI result, named client, agency-reported
Published priceRetainers from $5,000/mo; AEO page lists $6,500/mo for Paid Performance
Evidence 3.5/5
Baseline 5/5
B2B SaaS depth 5/5
Reviews 0/5
Pricing 5/5
Method 5/5
Full profile
- Website
- tripledart.com
- HQ / founded / team
- Plano, TX and Bengaluru, India · 2021 · 80+
- Services
- SEO, AEO and GEO, GTM engineering, RevOps and attribution, Paid media, Creative, ABM
- Best named AI result
- Signeasy: LLM sessions +3,650% (15-20 monthly sessions in September 2024 to 700-750 monthly sessions); 98 qualified leads over 6 months. (source)
- Evidence band
- B: AI result, named client, agency-reported
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- Yes, free AI visibility report and complimentary GEO audit
- Clutch
- Not verified
- Own ranking
- Publishes its own list and places itself first: see list
- Evidence and scope notes
- Two of its pages give different timeframes for the Signeasy result.
Evidence 3.5/5 · Baseline 5/5 · B2B SaaS depth 5/5 · Reviews 0/5 · Pricing 5/5 · Method 5/5
Back to ranking ↑Omniscient Digital
Austin, TX
Best for: B2B software companies that want strategy-led SEO and GEO tied to pipeline on full-service engagements.
ATracked AI visibility share, named client
Published priceFull-service from $10,000/mo; SEO Strategy Development from $15,000
Evidence 5/5
Baseline 0/5
B2B SaaS depth 5/5
Reviews 2.5/5
Pricing 5/5
Method 3/5
Full profile
- Website
- beomniscient.com
- HQ / founded / team
- Austin, TX · Not published · Not published
- Services
- SEO strategy, GEO, Programmatic SEO, Technical SEO, Content production, Digital PR
- Best named AI result
- OnBoard: Visibility climbed from 73% in January 2026 to 88% in August 2026 across tracked, unbranded prompts; AI-referred sessions increased 58% MoM. (source)
- Evidence band
- A: Tracked AI visibility share, named client
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- No evidence found
- Method
- No named framework
- Own ranking
- Publishes its own list and places itself first: see list
- Evidence and scope notes
- Full-service engagements start at $10,000 a month; the site states it does not promise guaranteed or immediate results.
Evidence 5.0/5 · Baseline 0/5 · B2B SaaS depth 5/5 · Reviews 2.5/5 · Pricing 5/5 · Method 3/5
Back to ranking ↑Single Grain
Los Angeles, CA
Best for: Brands that want AEO/GEO combined with SEO and paid media management from one agency.
BAI result, named client, agency-reported
Published priceNot published
Evidence 3.5/5
Baseline 5/5
B2B SaaS depth 3/5
Reviews 4/5
Pricing 0/5
Method 5/5
Full profile
- Website
- singlegrain.com
- HQ / founded / team
- Los Angeles, CA · 2009 or 2014 (sources differ) · 10 to 49
- Services
- AEO and GEO, SEO, Paid media, Content marketing, CRO, Creative strategy
- Published price
- Not published
- Best named AI result
- SmartRent: +345% increase in referral traffic from LLMs; Google AIO: +50% increase in total citations; 100+ new citations across all major AI platforms (30-day results). (source)
- Evidence band
- B: AI result, named client, agency-reported
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- Yes, free AEO audit of brand performance in AI answer engines
- Own ranking
- Publishes its own list and places itself first: see list
- Evidence and scope notes
- Pricing is not published, and two SmartRent case study pages report different AI citation figures.
Evidence 3.5/5 · Baseline 5/5 · B2B SaaS depth 3/5 · Reviews 4/5 · Pricing 0/5 · Method 5/5
Back to ranking ↑Siege Media
San Diego, CA
Best for: Enterprise and midmarket brands that want content, digital PR and GEO delivered as research-backed assets.
ATracked AI visibility share, named client
Published priceNot published
Evidence 5/5
Baseline 0/5
B2B SaaS depth 3/5
Reviews 5/5
Pricing 0/5
Method 5/5
Full profile
- Website
- siegemedia.com
- HQ / founded / team
- San Diego, CA · 2012 · 50 to 249
- Services
- GEO, SEO consulting, Content strategy and creation, Digital PR, Reddit marketing, Web design
- Published price
- Not published
- Best named AI result
- Grow Therapy: AI-generated response visibility increased from 11% to 43%, October 2025 to June 2026. (source)
- Evidence band
- A: Tracked AI visibility share, named client
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- No evidence found
- Evidence and scope notes
- Pricing is not published, and its strongest AI-search case (Grow Therapy) is a healthcare company rather than B2B SaaS.
Evidence 5.0/5 · Baseline 0/5 · B2B SaaS depth 3/5 · Reviews 5/5 · Pricing 0/5 · Method 5/5
Back to ranking ↑Minuttia
Not published
Best for: B2B SaaS companies that want content-led SEO and AEO with digital PR and Reddit work run as one strategy.
BAI result, named client, agency-reported
Published priceMinimum project size $4,000+
Evidence 3.5/5
Baseline 0/5
B2B SaaS depth 4/5
Reviews 4/5
Pricing 5/5
Method 3/5
Full profile
- Website
- minuttia.com
- HQ / founded / team
- Not published · 2020 · 10 to 49
- Services
- Google and AI search strategy, Human and AI content creation, Digital PR, Reddit marketing, Agent analytics and reporting
- Published price
- Minimum project size $4,000+
- Best named AI result
- Meilisearch: 665% increase in LLM-driven traffic; 2,700% growth in LLM-driven conversions; 15,261 website visitors from AI platforms, January 1, 2025 to July 23, 2026. (source)
- Evidence band
- B: AI result, named client, agency-reported
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- No evidence found
- Method
- No named framework
- Own ranking
- Publishes its own list and places itself first: see list
- Evidence and scope notes
- The Meilisearch results are reported as aggregates without prompt-level data.
Evidence 3.5/5 · Baseline 0/5 · B2B SaaS depth 4/5 · Reviews 4/5 · Pricing 5/5 · Method 3/5
Back to ranking ↑Skale
London, England
Best for: Growth-stage SaaS and tech brands that want organic growth across Google, Reddit, YouTube and AI search, reported against signups and revenue.
BAI result, named client, agency-reported
Published priceNot published
Evidence 3.5/5
Baseline 0/5
B2B SaaS depth 5/5
Reviews 4/5
Pricing 0/5
Method 5/5
Full profile
- Website
- skale.so
- HQ / founded / team
- London, England · 2019 · 10 to 49
- Services
- SaaS SEO, GEO, AI brand mentions, Link building, Content production, Website migrations
- Published price
- Not published
- Best named AI result
- Jitter: AI brand coverage 22% (October 2025) to 55% (January 2026); brand mentions 5-467 (90x); domain citations 5-449 (90x). (source)
- Evidence band
- B: AI result, named client, agency-reported
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- No evidence found
- Evidence and scope notes
- Pricing is not published, and the Jitter case study shows aggregated AI brand coverage without prompt-level data.
Evidence 3.5/5 · Baseline 0/5 · B2B SaaS depth 5/5 · Reviews 4/5 · Pricing 0/5 · Method 5/5
Back to ranking ↑Optimist
Des Moines, IA
Best for: B2B technology companies that want an SEO plus AEO/GEO consulting or full-service program with published starting prices.
CClassic search metrics for a named client, or AI results on own properties
Published priceRoadmap from $7,500; retainers from $3,000/mo (advisory) or $4,000/mo (full-service)
Evidence 1.5/5
Baseline 5/5
B2B SaaS depth 5/5
Reviews 1/5
Pricing 5/5
Method 3/5
Full profile
- Website
- yesoptimist.com
- HQ / founded / team
- Des Moines, IA · 2016 · 10 to 49
- Services
- Full-service SEO, SEO consulting, AEO, GEO, Content marketing and strategy, AI visibility tracking
- Best named AI result
- No named-client AI-search outcome found on the agency's own site.
- Evidence band
- C: Classic search metrics for a named client, or AI results on own properties
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- Yes, free Organic Revenue Opportunity Analysis with competitive AI benchmark
- Method
- CORE (Complete Organic Revenue Engine) Framework
- Own ranking
- Publishes its own list and places itself first: see list
- Evidence and scope notes
- Its AEO/GEO case studies are anonymized, and its named-client case studies report classic organic metrics.
Evidence 1.5/5 · Baseline 5/5 · B2B SaaS depth 5/5 · Reviews 1/5 · Pricing 5/5 · Method 3/5
Back to ranking ↑Arc Intermedia
King of Prussia, PA
Best for: Enterprise and mid-market organizations that want GEO/AEO work bundled with SEO, paid media and web services from one agency.
BAI result, named client, agency-reported
Published priceApproximately $1,500 to $10,000+ per month; custom proposal required
Evidence 3.5/5
Baseline 5/5
B2B SaaS depth 1/5
Reviews 2.5/5
Pricing 5/5
Method 3/5
Full profile
- Website
- arcintermedia.com
- HQ / founded / team
- King of Prussia, PA · 2010 · 10 to 49
- Services
- SEO, GEO and AEO, Content marketing, Paid media, Website development, HubSpot implementation
- Best named AI result
- Acts Retirement-Life Communities: 726% increase in AI search traffic year-over-year; 36% better conversion rate for AI visitors versus average. (source)
- Evidence band
- B: AI result, named client, agency-reported
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- Yes, free audits of AI search presence
- Method
- No named framework
- Evidence and scope notes
- A full-service agency; Clutch lists a $25,000+ minimum project size, and no named B2B SaaS client was found.
Evidence 3.5/5 · Baseline 5/5 · B2B SaaS depth 1/5 · Reviews 2.5/5 · Pricing 5/5 · Method 3/5
Back to ranking ↑Scalerrs
Fully remote
Best for: Funded B2B SaaS teams that want SEO plus AEO, Reddit, YouTube and third-party listicle work in one SaaS-only engagement.
BAI result, named client, agency-reported
Published priceCustom scoped, typically from about $5K/month; month-to-month
Evidence 3.5/5
Baseline 0/5
B2B SaaS depth 4/5
Reviews 2.5/5
Pricing 5/5
Method 3/5
Full profile
- Website
- scalerrs.co
- HQ / founded / team
- Fully remote · 2023 · About 20+ (own site); Clutch lists 2 to 9
- Services
- SaaS SEO, AEO / AI search optimization, Content creation, Link building, Reddit marketing, YouTube marketing
- Best named AI result
- Morgen: 4,316 AI citations in 30 days; #3 in Average AI Visibility, within a 6-month engagement. (source)
- Evidence band
- B: AI result, named client, agency-reported
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- No evidence found
- Method
- No named framework
- Own ranking
- Publishes its own list and places itself first: see list
- Evidence and scope notes
- The Default case study reports AI citations without prompt-level data.
Evidence 3.5/5 · Baseline 0/5 · B2B SaaS depth 4/5 · Reviews 2.5/5 · Pricing 5/5 · Method 3/5
Back to ranking ↑Graphite
Not published
Best for: Brands that want research-driven AEO and SEO growth work.
ATracked AI visibility share, named client
Published priceNot published
Evidence 5/5
Baseline 0/5
B2B SaaS depth 5/5
Reviews 0/5
Pricing 0/5
Method 5/5
Full profile
- Website
- graphite.io
- HQ / founded / team
- Not published · Not published · Not published
- Services
- AEO, SEO, Performance marketing
- Published price
- Not published
- Best named AI result
- Webflow: LLM sign-ups doubled from 4% to 8% of total signups; share of voice rose from 33% to 64%, January to July 2025. (source)
- Evidence band
- A: Tracked AI visibility share, named client
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- No evidence found
- Clutch
- Not verified
- Evidence and scope notes
- Pricing, headquarters, founding date and team size are not published on its site, and no Clutch or G2 profile was found.
Evidence 5.0/5 · Baseline 0/5 · B2B SaaS depth 5/5 · Reviews 0/5 · Pricing 0/5 · Method 5/5
Back to ranking ↑Directive
Orange County, CA
Best for: B2B and SaaS companies that want GEO run inside a broader performance marketing program tied to pipeline.
BAI result, named client, agency-reported
Published priceNot published
Evidence 3.5/5
Baseline 0/5
B2B SaaS depth 3/5
Reviews 5/5
Pricing 0/5
Method 5/5
Full profile
- Website
- directiveconsulting.com
- HQ / founded / team
- Orange County, CA · 2013 · 100+
- Services
- GEO, AEO, SEO, Paid media, Revenue operations, Content
- Published price
- Not published
- Best named AI result
- Case Status: 20% increase in demo bookings over forecast (54 completions vs. 45 goal); organic sessions up 19% quarter-over-quarter, within nine months. (source)
- Evidence band
- B: AI result, named client, agency-reported
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- No evidence found
- Method
- DiscoverabilityOS
- Evidence and scope notes
- GEO sits inside a larger paid-media-led service mix, and the Case Status page shows no citation counts or prompt data.
Evidence 3.5/5 · Baseline 0/5 · B2B SaaS depth 3/5 · Reviews 5/5 · Pricing 0/5 · Method 5/5
Back to ranking ↑Breaking B2B
Not published
Best for: B2B and SaaS companies that want senior-led SEO and AEO tied to demos and pipeline on a six or twelve month program.
BAI result, named client, agency-reported
Published pricePlans from $4k/mo; tiers up to $40,000+/mo; six or twelve month minimum
Evidence 3.5/5
Baseline 0/5
B2B SaaS depth 5/5
Reviews 0/5
Pricing 5/5
Method 3/5
Full profile
- Website
- breakingb2b.com
- HQ / founded / team
- Not published · Not published · Not published
- Services
- SEO, AEO, GEO, Technical SEO, Content strategy, Link building
- Best named AI result
- Chattermill: AI mention rate 20% to 80%; enterprise RFPs from four or five a year to around 15. Period: January to May, year not stated. (source)
- Evidence band
- B: AI result, named client, agency-reported
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- No evidence found
- Clutch
- Not verified
- Method
- No named framework
- Own ranking
- Publishes its own list and places itself first: see list
- Evidence and scope notes
- Pricing pages state a six or twelve month minimum, and the Chattermill AI mention rate has no described measurement method.
Evidence 3.5/5 · Baseline 0/5 · B2B SaaS depth 5/5 · Reviews 0/5 · Pricing 5/5 · Method 3/5
Back to ranking ↑Avenue Z
Miami, FL
Best for: Consumer, fintech and emerging-tech brands that want AI search optimization run together with digital PR and performance media.
BAI result, named client, agency-reported
Published priceNot published
Evidence 3.5/5
Baseline 0/5
B2B SaaS depth 3/5
Reviews 4/5
Pricing 0/5
Method 5/5
Full profile
- Website
- avenuez.com
- HQ / founded / team
- Miami, FL · 2021 or 2023 (sources differ) · 50 to 249
- Services
- PR and communications, Creator-led performance media, AI search optimization (AEO), SEO, CRO
- Published price
- Not published
- Best named AI result
- Prometeo: 357% increase in AI visibility; 867% growth in AI referral traffic (monthly average), within six months. (source)
- Evidence band
- B: AI result, named client, agency-reported
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- No evidence found
- Own ranking
- Publishes its own list and places itself first: see list
- Evidence and scope notes
- A full-service PR and performance agency rather than a B2B SaaS specialist, with a $10,000+ minimum project size listed on Clutch.
Evidence 3.5/5 · Baseline 0/5 · B2B SaaS depth 3/5 · Reviews 4/5 · Pricing 0/5 · Method 5/5
Back to ranking ↑Foundation
Philadelphia, PA
Best for: B2B tech and SaaS companies that want AI visibility built through content plus off-site distribution such as Reddit, YouTube and earned media.
BAI result, named client, agency-reported
Published priceNot published
Evidence 3.5/5
Baseline 0/5
B2B SaaS depth 4/5
Reviews 4/5
Pricing 0/5
Method 3/5
Full profile
- Website
- foundationinc.co
- HQ / founded / team
- Philadelphia, PA · 2014 · 10 to 49
- Services
- AI visibility strategy, GEO, Content strategy and distribution, Technical SEO, Reddit and YouTube marketing, Digital PR
- Published price
- Not published
- Best named AI result
- Bitly: #1 QR code visibility position in AI answers at 27.3%; citation share for link shorteners grew to 11.7%. Period: 12 months. (source)
- Evidence band
- B: AI result, named client, agency-reported
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- No evidence found
- Method
- No named framework
- Evidence and scope notes
- Aggregate claims such as 2,400% LLM visibility growth are not tied to a single named case study, and Clutch lists a $25,000+ minimum.
Evidence 3.5/5 · Baseline 0/5 · B2B SaaS depth 4/5 · Reviews 4/5 · Pricing 0/5 · Method 3/5
Back to ranking ↑NoGood
New York, NY
Best for: Venture-backed brands that want AEO run alongside paid, SEO and CRO inside one growth retainer.
BAI result, named client, agency-reported
Published priceAverage retainer above $20,000/mo
Evidence 3.5/5
Baseline 0/5
B2B SaaS depth 2/5
Reviews 1/5
Pricing 5/5
Method 3/5
Full profile
- Website
- nogood.io
- HQ / founded / team
- New York, NY · 2016 · 10 to 49
- Services
- AEO, SEO, Paid search and social, CRO, Content marketing, Fractional CMO
- Published price
- Average retainer above $20,000/mo
- Best named AI result
- SteelSeries: 23x increase in YoY AI search traffic; 27x increase in YoY conversions from AI platforms; data through October 2025. (source)
- Evidence band
- B: AI result, named client, agency-reported
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- No evidence found
- Method
- No named framework
- Own ranking
- Publishes its own list and places itself first: see list
- Evidence and scope notes
- The homepage states an average retainer above $20,000/month, and the Clutch profile shows only 2 reviews.
Evidence 3.5/5 · Baseline 0/5 · B2B SaaS depth 2/5 · Reviews 1/5 · Pricing 5/5 · Method 3/5
Back to ranking ↑Omnius
London, UK
Best for: B2B SaaS and fintech companies that want SEO and AEO/GEO from a small agency with proprietary AI SEO analytics software.
BAI result, named client, agency-reported
Published priceNot published
Evidence 3.5/5
Baseline 0/5
B2B SaaS depth 5/5
Reviews 0/5
Pricing 0/5
Method 3/5
Full profile
- Website
- omnius.so
- HQ / founded / team
- London, UK · Not published · Not published
- Services
- B2B SEO, GEO, AEO, Content marketing, Programmatic SEO, CRO and development
- Published price
- Not published
- Best named AI result
- ANNA Money: AI search traffic up 164.44% and AI Overview keywords from 183 to 837 (+357%), May to September 2025. (source)
- Evidence band
- B: AI result, named client, agency-reported
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- No evidence found
- Clutch
- Not verified
- Method
- No named framework
- Own ranking
- Publishes its own list and places itself first: see list
- Evidence and scope notes
- Pricing is not published, no verified Clutch profile for the agency was found, and it onboards up to 8 clients per year.
Evidence 3.5/5 · Baseline 0/5 · B2B SaaS depth 5/5 · Reviews 0/5 · Pricing 0/5 · Method 3/5
Back to ranking ↑Ten Speed
Chicago, IL
Best for: B2B and SaaS brands that want an organic growth, content and SEO program with AEO added, led by the founders.
CClassic search metrics for a named client, or AI results on own properties
Published priceNot published
Evidence 1.5/5
Baseline 0/5
B2B SaaS depth 5/5
Reviews 2.5/5
Pricing 0/5
Method 3/5
Full profile
- Website
- tenspeed.io
- HQ / founded / team
- Chicago, IL · 2020 · 15
- Services
- Organic growth strategy, Content creation, SEO, Answer Engine Optimization, Digital PR, Design
- Published price
- Not published
- Best named AI result
- No named-client AI-search outcome found on the agency's own site.
- Evidence band
- C: Classic search metrics for a named client, or AI results on own properties
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- No evidence found
- Method
- No named framework
- Own ranking
- Publishes its own list and places itself first: see list
- Evidence and scope notes
- No named client with an AI-search outcome and no published pricing were found; its case studies report classic organic traffic and trials.
Evidence 1.5/5 · Baseline 0/5 · B2B SaaS depth 5/5 · Reviews 2.5/5 · Pricing 0/5 · Method 3/5
Back to ranking ↑Go Fish Digital
Raleigh, NC
Best for: Mid-market and enterprise brands in ecommerce, finance and retail that want GEO and SEO inside a full-service digital marketing engagement.
CClassic search metrics for a named client, or AI results on own properties
Published priceNot published
Evidence 1.5/5
Baseline 0/5
B2B SaaS depth 3/5
Reviews 4/5
Pricing 0/5
Method 3/5
Full profile
- Website
- gofishdigital.com
- HQ / founded / team
- Raleigh, NC · 2005 · 250 to 999
- Services
- GEO, SEO, Paid search and paid social, Digital PR, CRO, Web design and development
- Published price
- Not published
- Best named AI result
- Go Fish Digital (own site, no external client): +43% growth in monthly AI-driven traffic from ChatGPT and referral sources; +83.33% lift in monthly conversions from AI referrals, over 3 months. (source)
- Evidence band
- C: Classic search metrics for a named client, or AI results on own properties
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- No evidence found
- Method
- No named framework
- Evidence and scope notes
- A generalist full-service agency, and its only AI-referral case study is on its own site with no external client named.
Evidence 1.5/5 · Baseline 0/5 · B2B SaaS depth 3/5 · Reviews 4/5 · Pricing 0/5 · Method 3/5
Back to ranking ↑Animalz
New York, NY
Best for: B2B SaaS and tech companies that want thought-leadership content and SEO/AEO programs on a monthly retainer.
CClassic search metrics for a named client, or AI results on own properties
Published priceNot published
Evidence 1.5/5
Baseline 0/5
B2B SaaS depth 5/5
Reviews 0/5
Pricing 0/5
Method 3/5
Full profile
- Website
- animalz.co
- HQ / founded / team
- New York, NY · 2015 · 10 to 49
- Services
- AEO, SEO, Content marketing, Thought leadership, Survey-driven whitepapers, Content refreshes
- Published price
- Not published
- Best named AI result
- No named-client AI-search outcome found on the agency's own site.
- Evidence band
- C: Classic search metrics for a named client, or AI results on own properties
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- No evidence found
- Clutch
- No reviews on Clutch
- Method
- No named framework
- Own ranking
- Publishes its own list and places itself first: see list
- Evidence and scope notes
- Its case study index shows only classic SEO metrics, and no AI citation results were found.
Evidence 1.5/5 · Baseline 0/5 · B2B SaaS depth 5/5 · Reviews 0/5 · Pricing 0/5 · Method 3/5
Back to ranking ↑First Page Sage
Not published
Best for: B2B SaaS and enterprise companies that want thought-leadership SEO and GEO content on a long-term retainer.
CClassic search metrics for a named client, or AI results on own properties
Published priceNot published
Evidence 1.5/5
Baseline 0/5
B2B SaaS depth 3/5
Reviews 0/5
Pricing 0/5
Method 5/5
Full profile
- Website
- firstpagesage.com
- HQ / founded / team
- Not published · Not published · Not published
- Services
- SEO, GEO/AEO, Thought leadership content, Web design, Demand generation, Fractional CMO
- Published price
- Not published
- Best named AI result
- No named-client AI-search outcome found on the agency's own site.
- Evidence band
- C: Classic search metrics for a named client, or AI results on own properties
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- No evidence found
- Clutch
- No reviews on Clutch
- Own ranking
- Publishes its own list and places itself first: see list
- Evidence and scope notes
- Client identities are not disclosed in the AI-search case studies we reviewed.
Evidence 1.5/5 · Baseline 0/5 · B2B SaaS depth 3/5 · Reviews 0/5 · Pricing 0/5 · Method 5/5
Back to ranking ↑OuterBox
Akron, OH
Best for: Ecommerce, manufacturing and industrial brands that want GEO folded into a full-service SEO, paid media and web program.
ENo AI-search evidence published
Published priceNot published
Evidence 0/5
Baseline 0/5
B2B SaaS depth 1/5
Reviews 5/5
Pricing 0/5
Method 5/5
Full profile
- Website
- outerboxdesign.com
- HQ / founded / team
- Akron, OH · 2004 · 300+
- Services
- SEO, GEO, Paid media, Conversion optimization, Web design, Email marketing
- Published price
- Not published
- Best named AI result
- No named-client AI-search outcome found on the agency's own site.
- Evidence band
- E: No AI-search evidence published
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- No evidence found
- Method
- LLM Audit Framework
- Evidence and scope notes
- A generalist agency, and no case study with an AI-search outcome and no B2B SaaS case study were found.
Evidence 0.0/5 · Baseline 0/5 · B2B SaaS depth 1/5 · Reviews 5/5 · Pricing 0/5 · Method 5/5
Back to ranking ↑Contently
Not published
Best for: Regulated enterprise marketing teams that want a content platform with editorial workflow, a creator network and an AEO/LLM optimization module.
DUnnamed client
Published priceNot published
Evidence 1/5
Baseline 5/5
B2B SaaS depth 1/5
Reviews 0/5
Pricing 0/5
Method 3/5
Full profile
- Website
- contently.com
- HQ / founded / team
- Not published · 2011 · Not published
- Services
- Content marketing platform, Creator talent network, AI Studio for content creation, LLM Optimization / AEO, Compliance-reviewed editorial workflow
- Published price
- Not published
- Best named AI result
- No named-client AI-search outcome found on the agency's own site.
- Evidence band
- D: Unnamed client
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- Yes, 30-minute walkthrough with a citation snapshot in your vertical
- Clutch
- Not verified
- Method
- No named framework
- Evidence and scope notes
- A platform and services vendor priced by quote, whose AI-search claim of 4.1x more citations is unnamed and aggregate.
Evidence 1.0/5 · Baseline 5/5 · B2B SaaS depth 1/5 · Reviews 0/5 · Pricing 0/5 · Method 3/5
Back to ranking ↑Marcel Digital
Chicago, IL
Best for: B2B companies, including higher education, manufacturing and logistics, that want AEO, SEO, paid media and web development from one generalist agency.
DUnnamed client
Published priceNot published
Evidence 1/5
Baseline 0/5
B2B SaaS depth 1/5
Reviews 4/5
Pricing 0/5
Method 3/5
Full profile
- Website
- marceldigital.com
- HQ / founded / team
- Chicago, IL · 2003 · 10 to 49
- Services
- Answer Engine Optimization, SEO, Paid media, Web development, Data and insights, CRO
- Published price
- Not published
- Best named AI result
- No named-client AI-search outcome found on the agency's own site.
- Evidence band
- D: Unnamed client
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- No evidence found
- Method
- No named framework
- Evidence and scope notes
- A generalist agency whose AI-search case study is anonymized and whose pricing is not published.
Evidence 1.0/5 · Baseline 0/5 · B2B SaaS depth 1/5 · Reviews 4/5 · Pricing 0/5 · Method 3/5
Back to ranking ↑iPullRank
Not published
Best for: Large enterprise brands that want a research-driven, technical GEO and content engineering practice.
DUnnamed client
Published priceNot published
Evidence 1/5
Baseline 0/5
B2B SaaS depth 1/5
Reviews 0/5
Pricing 0/5
Method 5/5
Full profile
- Website
- ipullrank.com
- HQ / founded / team
- Not published · Not published · Not published
- Services
- GEO, Relevance Engineering, Content engineering, Technical SEO, Generative AI, Measurement and attribution
- Published price
- Not published
- Best named AI result
- No named-client AI-search outcome found on the agency's own site.
- Evidence band
- D: Unnamed client
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- No evidence found
- Clutch
- No reviews on Clutch
- Method
- Relevance Engineering
- Evidence and scope notes
- No named-client case study with AI-search results was found on its own site, and the Clutch profile lists a $50,000+ minimum project size.
Evidence 1.0/5 · Baseline 0/5 · B2B SaaS depth 1/5 · Reviews 0/5 · Pricing 0/5 · Method 5/5
Back to ranking ↑Genevate
Not published
Best for: Companies across professional services, consumer, tech and healthcare that want a PR-led approach to how AI search platforms describe them.
ENo AI-search evidence published
Published priceNot published
Evidence 0/5
Baseline 0/5
B2B SaaS depth 1/5
Reviews 0/5
Pricing 0/5
Method 3/5
Full profile
- Website
- genevate.co
- HQ / founded / team
- Not published · Not published · Not published
- Services
- GEO, SEO, Agentic search optimization, PR and strategic marketing consulting
- Published price
- Not published
- Best named AI result
- No named-client AI-search outcome found on the agency's own site.
- Evidence band
- E: No AI-search evidence published
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- No evidence found
- Clutch
- Not verified
- Method
- No named framework
- Evidence and scope notes
- The homepage shows client logos but no case studies, metrics or pricing were found on the site.
Evidence 0.0/5 · Baseline 0/5 · B2B SaaS depth 1/5 · Reviews 0/5 · Pricing 0/5 · Method 3/5
Back to ranking ↑Digital Cheddar
Okemos, MI
Best for: Consumer and CPG brands that want a small hands-on agency for paid media, social and creative with AEO as an added service.
DUnnamed client
Published priceNot published
Evidence 1/5
Baseline 0/5
B2B SaaS depth 1/5
Reviews 0/5
Pricing 0/5
Method 0/5
Full profile
- Website
- digitalcheddar.com
- HQ / founded / team
- Okemos, MI · 2014 · 3
- Services
- Paid search, PPC and retail marketing, Social media management, SEO, Answer Engine Optimization, Website development
- Published price
- Not published
- Best named AI result
- No named-client AI-search outcome found on the agency's own site.
- Evidence band
- D: Unnamed client
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- No evidence found
- Clutch
- Not verified
- Method
- No named framework
- Evidence and scope notes
- Its About page names three team members; its AEO case study is anonymized and covers a program that began in July 2026.
Evidence 1.0/5 · Baseline 0/5 · B2B SaaS depth 1/5 · Reviews 0/5 · Pricing 0/5 · Method 0/5
Back to ranking ↑Also named on other lists. The 12 roundups we reviewed name 82 agencies in total. The 50 agencies that appear on only one list and are not profiled above include specialists with little public AI-search evidence at the time of checking. We will add any of them that publish a named AI-search case study before the next quarterly re-check.
Original data: 5,310 B2B sites in traffic collapse
Between July and September 2026 we identified B2B software and services domains through buyer-intent category searches and kept those whose modeled organic traffic had fallen at least 45% from its peak. After live verification, 5,310 domains remained. Traffic figures are DataForSEO estimates, not first-party analytics.
One square per verified domain. A count, not a distribution.
Median drop from peak organic traffic
0%50%100% drop
Middle half (IQR): 53% to 76%. Median: 63%.
Share of verified domains
83%
Share with a drop above 50%
35%
Share with a drop above 70%
Median modeled visits per month, peak vs latest
28,601Peak
8,780Latest
69% aggregate fall between these visit figures. The median site drop is 63%.
01 / The sample
5,310 verified domains
Traffic figures are DataForSEO estimates, not first-party analytics.
02 / The middle half
63% (middle half: 53% to 76%)
Median drop from peak organic traffic
03 / The thresholds
83% Share with a drop above 50%
35% Share with a drop above 70%
04 / Monthly visits
28,601 vs 8,780
Median modeled visits per month, peak vs latest
Category with the steepest median drop (n of 30+)
Martech, 68% (n = 453)
Show as table
| Measure (n = 5,310 verified domains) | Value |
|---|---|
| Median drop from peak organic traffic | 63% (middle half: 53% to 76%) |
| Share with a drop above 50% | 83% |
| Share with a drop above 70% | 35% |
| Median modeled visits per month, peak vs latest | 28,601 vs 8,780 |
| Category with the steepest median drop (n of 30+) | Martech, 68% (n = 453) |
AEO, GEO, AIO, LLMO: what the terms mean
They describe the same job from different angles: getting a company named, cited or recommended when a buyer asks an AI system instead of scrolling search results.
GEO (Generative Engine Optimization)
comes from an academic paper by Aggarwal and colleagues, "GEO: Generative Engine Optimization" (KDD 2024). The authors report that content changes can raise visibility in generative engine answers by up to 40%, and that the effect varies by subject area.
AEO (Answer Engine Optimization)
is the older marketing term, originally about featured snippets and voice answers, now used for AI answers too.
AIO
usually means optimizing for Google's AI Overviews specifically. LLMO means optimizing for large language models in general.
In practice the agencies on this list use the terms interchangeably. Ask what they measure, not what they call it. The measure that matters to a B2B buyer is Share of Model: in what share of AI answers to your buyers' questions is your company named, compared with your strongest competitor.
Who publishes this, and where peppereffect fits
peppereffect is an AI automation agency in Hamminkeln, Germany, founded in 2019. We produce AEO and GEO content for B2B software companies and measure whether AI answers name them.
Our strongest result, with its limits stated
Helium42: search and AI-referral growth on a brand we run with a partner
Google clicks per 90 days
28 4,209
Before / After
Google impressions per 90 days
11,382 764,408
Before / After
Average Google position
17.4 10.3
Before / After
Lower is better
Visits referred by AI assistants per 90 days
3 245
Before / After
Sources: Google Search Console and HubSpot traffic analytics (source "AI referrals"), 14 Dec 2025 to 13 Mar 2026 compared with 28 Jun to 25 Sep 2026. Two 90-day periods.
What this does and does not show. Helium42 is a brand peppereffect runs with a partner, not a paying client, so under our own rubric it counts as a result on an own property. AI assistants referred 245 visits, 3.4% of all visits in the later period: real, but small. None of this is a tracked AI visibility share. One article drove about half of the later period's clicks. The figures show growth; they do not prove how much of it our work caused. We show it because it is a result we can open to you in full on a call, Search Console included. Read the Helium42 case study.
Why a small number still matters. HubSpot measured its own answer-engine traffic from June to December 2025: leads that came from AI answers converted at 3 times the rate of its other sources. A Microsoft Clarity study of 1,277 mostly publisher sites found the same direction for sign-ups (1.66% from AI assistants against 0.15% from search), though over one month and outside B2B software. AI referrals were a small share of visits in both data sets, and in both they converted better.
Talk to peppereffect if your organic clicks are falling, you want the content produced and not only measured, and you want to see how AI engines answer your buyers before you pay anything.
If you need a named client case study with a tracked AI visibility share before a first call, 5 of the 32 ranked agencies publish one. We do not yet. We earn the call with a free snapshot of your own AI answers instead.
Five of your buyers' questions, four AI engines, twenty answers within 48 hours. A sample, not a full measurement.
peppereffect's facts in profile format
Same fields, same sources, same checking date as every agency above. No score and no rank: apply the rubric yourself if you want a number.
peppereffect This is us
Not ranked, not scoredBest for: B2B software companies whose organic clicks are falling and who want AI-answer content produced, not only measured.
Full profile
- Website
- peppereffect.com
- HQ / founded / team
- Hamminkeln, Germany · 2019 · Founder-led, with delivery partners
- Services
- AEO/GEO content production, Share-of-Model measurement, HubSpot builds and migrations, n8n automation
- Published price
- Not published for direct clients (agency wholesale of $2,000 per client per month is published)
- Best named AI result
- Helium42 (a brand peppereffect runs with a partner, not a client): Google clicks per 90 days from 28 to 4,209 and impressions from 11,382 to 764,408 (Google Search Console, 14 Dec 2025 to 13 Mar 2026 against 28 Jun to 25 Sep 2026). Visits referred by AI assistants per 90 days from 3 to 245 (HubSpot analytics, same periods). Not a tracked AI visibility share. (source)
- Evidence band
- C: Classic search metrics for a named client, or AI results on own properties
- Pre-contract AI baseline
- Yes, free measurement: 5 buyer questions across 4 AI engines, 20 answers within 48 hours
- Clutch
- No Clutch profile
- Evidence and scope notes
- No named external client with a published AI-search result yet; the one named case study is Whitehat, a partner company our founder works with.
See your own number first
Before you talk to any agency on this list, measure where you stand. We put five of your buyers' real questions to ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude and Perplexity and show you who gets named instead of you. Twenty answers, free, within 48 hours.
