peppereffect editorial standard

The 23-Check Citation Standard

The gate every peppereffect article passes before it goes live. Version 1.0, September 2026.

Four gates, 23 checks, in order. A page that fails any check in a gate does not move to the next gate. Gate 2 is where most drafts lose material, and that is the gate doing its job. Print this, or work through it on screen.

0 of 23 complete

1Does this page deserve to exist?

Five checks. Most content operations skip this gate entirely, which is how a blog ends up with four articles competing for one query.

Fails most often: check 03. A topic with volume and no defensible asset feels like an opportunity right up to the moment the AI Overview answers it in three sentences.

2Is every claim traceable?

Seven checks. This is where the drafts die.

Fails most often: checks 07 and 09, together. A number gets attributed to a company that never published it, and the link points at that company's homepage, so nobody can check.

3Is it built to be cited, and to earn the click?

Six checks. Citation and click are two different jobs and both have to be designed in.

Fails most often: check 17. Schema is copied from a template and quietly keeps someone else's name in the publisher field for months.

4Is it live, and is what is live what we wrote?

Five checks. The draft passing is not the same thing as the page passing.

Fails most often: check 19. A page that publishes as a placeholder looks fine in the CMS and is empty to everyone else.